Archi-Civilarchi-civil.com
TBDY 2018 · TBDY-08  |  Confidence: A

Home / Articles / TBDY 2018 TBDY-08

Choosing a Structural System: Why Table 4.1 Is Not Enough on Its Own

Table 4.1 gives three numbers for each of 46 structural systems: R, D and the permitted building height class. But an engineer choosing a system for a school by this table alone could make a decision that violates the code. The rule sits outside the table, in Clause 4.3.4.1.

Confidence: A Engine: engine/seismic-tr.js Test: tests/v581-tbdy-systems-pack.test.js Reading: ~11 min Last verified: 2026-10-21 Türkçe: Türkçe oku
Open the calculator → All articles →

1. The table's three columns

TBDY 2018 Table 4.1 lists 46 structural systems in six groups: cast-in-place RC, precast RC, steel, light-gauge steel, masonry and timber. For each it gives three values:

2. Three ductility levels

Each group is divided into three levels: high ductility, mixed (a limited-ductility frame together with high-ductility walls) and limited ductility. High ductility means a larger R and a wider height range, in exchange for the strict detailing rules of Chapter 7 (confinement, strong column–weak beam, shear safety). Limited ductility means simpler details, in exchange for a small R and use only in low buildings.

For a cast-in-place RC frame, for example: high ductility (A11) has R = 8 and BYS ≥ 3; limited ductility (A31) has R = 4 and BYS ≥ 7. In the long-period range the limited system's seismic force is twice that of the high-ductility one.

3. Two buildings, two answers

Consider two buildings in the same province (DTS 1): a 30 m residential building and the site's three-storey school block (HN = 10.2 m). The residential building is DTS 1 and BYS 4; the school, being BKS 1, is DTS 1a and BYS 7. Which cast-in-place RC systems may be used? (Values from the site's Table 4.1 code pack, BYS from the site's engine.)

CodeSystemDuctilityRDPermitted BYSResidential, 30 m (DTS 1, BYS 4)School, 10.2 m (DTS 1a, BYS 7)
A11High-ductility RC moment frameHigh83≥ 3✓✓
A12High-ductility coupled RC wallsHigh72.5≥ 2✓✓
A13High-ductility uncoupled RC wallsHigh62.5≥ 2✓✓
A14High-ductility frame + coupled wallsHigh82.5≥ 2✓✓
A15High-ductility frame + uncoupled wallsHigh72.5≥ 2✓✓
A16Single-storey, roof-pinned high-ductility columns (≤ 12 m)High32–single storeysingle storey
A21Limited-ductility frame + high-ductility coupled wallsMixed62.5≥ 4✓✓
A22Limited-ductility frame + high-ductility uncoupled wallsMixed52.5≥ 4✓✓
A23Joist-slab limited-ductility frame + coupled wallsMixed62.5≥ 6✗ Table 4.1 (BYS)✓
A24Joist-slab limited-ductility frame + uncoupled wallsMixed52.5≥ 6✗ Table 4.1 (BYS)✓
A31Limited-ductility RC moment frameLimited42.5≥ 7✗ Table 4.1 (BYS)✗ Clause 4.3.4.1(a)
A32Limited-ductility uncoupled RC wallsLimited42≥ 6✗ Table 4.1 (BYS)✗ Clause 4.3.4.1(a)
A33Limited-ductility frame + limited-ductility wallsLimited42≥ 6✗ Table 4.1 (BYS)✗ Clause 4.3.4.1(a)

For the residential building the table suffices: the limited systems and two mixed ones are excluded by the BYS column. But look at the school column: the limited-ductility frame A31 appears permitted by Table 4.1 (BYS ≥ 7, and the school is BYS 7). It still may not be used, because the rule lies outside the table, in Clause 4.3.4.1(a).

The site's example complies: the three-storey school example uses a high-ductility RC frame (A11, R = 8).

4. Rules outside the table

5. Where is D used?

The use of D applies the capacity-design principle:

The reasoning: when a building yields in an earthquake, the yielding members carry more force than the design calculation assumed (overstrength). Brittle members not designed for that larger force would fail before the ductile ones, and the whole benefit of ductility would be lost.

6. Checklist for selection

  1. Find DTS from the building use class and SDS; is there an "a"?
  2. Find BYS from HN and DTS.
  3. Check the system's permitted BYS in Table 4.1.
  4. Check Clause 4.3.4.1: if DTS has "a", no limited system; if BYS ≤ 6 and DTS 1a/2a, no mixed system either.
  5. If BYS 1, go to Chapter 13.
  6. If there is a weak storey, reduce R.
About the source: every R, D and BYS value in this article comes from the site's new code pack (data/code-packs/TR/tbdy2018-systems.json), transcribed from the official annex PDF of the code with each of its 46 rows verified programmatically.

References

  1. TBDY 2018 — Table 4.1 (pp. 35–38); Clauses 4.3.4.1, 4.3.4.2, 4.3.4.10; Clauses 4.3.5.1–4.3.5.3; Clause 3.6.2.3; Clauses 13.1.4–13.1.5; Tables 3.1–3.3. Official Gazette, 18.03.2018, No. 30364 (repeated), annex. Checked against the official annex PDF (2026-10-21).
  2. Table 4.1 code pack: data/code-packs/TR/tbdy2018-systems.json, test: tests/v581-tbdy-systems-pack.test.js. BYS: heightClassTBDY().
  3. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, Chapter 1 (capacity design). Wiley.

The numbers in this article were produced by the site's engines; code values are given with their clause numbers.

archi-civil.com — Choosing a Structural System: Why Table 4.1 Is Not Enough on Its Own · TBDY-08 ·